The Side Effects of Sling Surgery for Stress Incontinence
Urinary incontinence is a debilitating condition that significantly impacts quality of life for millions of women worldwide. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) accounts for more than 50% of cases. For those seeking relief, surgical options, such as mid-urethral sling surgery, have become common but are not without risks. The “sling” acts like a hammock to lift and support the bladder and urethra to help prevent bladder leaks. However, while sling surgeries are typically effective in the short term, they are not without side effects and potential long-term complications. Let’s explore the side effects, long-term efficacy, and emerging alternatives for treating stress incontinence.
What Are Sling Surgeries?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ecea/2ecead9fadecd4074e6ed2e562ec015d3331b0e8" alt="sling surgery for stress incontinence"
Mid-urethral sling surgeries are the gold standard surgical produce for stress incontinence. The surgery places a mesh sling under the urethra and bladder neck to provide support during activities that increase abdominal pressure, such as coughing, sneezing, or exercising. The goal of this surgery is to keep the urethra closed when you exert pressure on the bladder to prevent urine leakage – but this surgery does not address pelvic muscle weakness, the primary cause of stress incontinence. Mid-urethral sling surgeries are often minimally invasive and have high success rates in terms of symptom relief immediately following the procedure.
However, the question remains: what happens years after the surgery? More than 50% of women will continue to report stress incontinence up to 11 years later and more than 1 in 4 women will require more than one surgery. Complications and poor outcomes can significantly impact a woman’s health and quality of life.
Common Side Effects of Sling Surgeries
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15f46/15f464a7d12c242138d60c075c043160b68e6c7b" alt="pain and side effects after sling surgery"
While many patients experience initial success, sling surgeries can lead to various short- and long-term side effects, including:
1. Bladder Perforation
This can occur during surgery from the mesh or a surgical instrument puncturing your bladder. This can lead to bleeding, pain, and the need for additional surgery to correct the perforation.
2. Pain and Discomfort
Many women report persistent pelvic or vaginal pain after surgery. This discomfort can interfere with daily activities and significantly diminish quality of life. In some cases, pain may result from a nerve injury or mesh-related complications.
3. Urgency Urinary Incontinence
Ironically, some patients experience new or worsened symptoms of urge incontinence after a sling surgery. Urgency urinary incontinence, characterized by a sudden and uncontrollable need to urinate resulting in an accident, can occur due to bladder irritation or obstruction caused by the sling.
4. Continued Stress Incontinence
Despite the surgical attempt to support the urethra and bladder, some women will continue to have stress incontinence and require additional treatment interventions.
5. Mesh Erosion, Exposure, or Extrusion
When the sling material wears through the vaginal wall or into nearby organs, serious complications result. This can lead to infections, bleeding, and the need for additional corrective surgeries.
7. Sexual Dysfunction
A significant yet under-discussed side effect of sling surgeries is sexual dysfunction. Women may experience pain during intercourse (dyspareunia), reduced sensation, or emotional distress related to the physical changes brought on by surgery.
8. Infection and UTIs
Infections related to the surgical site or the mesh material itself are another potential side effect. These infections, along with recurrent UTI complaints, may require antibiotics or, in severe cases, removal of the sling.
9. Urinary Retention
Some individuals find it difficult to empty their bladder completely after a sling procedure. This can lead to a feeling of incomplete relief and an increased risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs).
10. Emotional Distress
Beyond physical discomfort, complications like chronic pain, incontinence recurrence, or sexual dysfunction can lead to frustration, anxiety, or depression. The psychological toll can sometimes be as challenging as the physical symptoms.
Long-Term Efficacy: Is Sling Surgery a Permanent Solution?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32e33/32e334e23798deb06764522c3ac0efbc796efc98" alt="woman thinking at computer"
While sling surgeries are often promoted as long-lasting solutions for SUI, their efficacy can diminish over time.
- Recurrence Rates: Studies have found that up to 50% of women experience a return of urinary incontinence symptoms within 10 years of the procedure and 14% experience recurrence in as little as 3 months.
- Need for Revision Surgery: The need for secondary surgeries, either to address complications or to restore effectiveness, is not uncommon. Research finds rates as low as 3.7% up to 29%. This highlights the importance of understanding the long-term implications of these procedures.
- Removal of Mesh: Roughly 60% of revisions/removals are due to mesh erosion.
Additionally, changes in a woman’s body over time, such as menopause, weight fluctuations, stress, or further weakening of pelvic floor muscles, can impact the durability of the sling’s support.
Alternatives to Sling Surgery: Safer and Effective Solutions
Given the potential risks and complications, many women are now exploring non-surgical alternatives for managing urinary incontinence. These options can often provide relief without the risks associated with surgery:
1. Flyte: A Clinically Proven At-Home Solution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88bb/d88bb2873ee02cb36c5bbcd3909439f855eda571" alt="flyte therapy medical device for stress incontinence"
Flyte, an FDA-cleared and clinically proven medical device for stress incontinence. Flyte is an innovative device that uses mechanotherapy to strengthen and tone the pelvic floor muscles. Offering surgical-level results for mild, moderate and severe SUI in just five minutes a day for six weeks, Flyte is a convenient, safe, first-line, non-invasive alternative to sling surgeries to restore continence quickly with lasting benefits. It’s particularly appealing for those who prefer to avoid the risks associated with surgery and the side effects of mesh. Studies show that Flyte’s effectiveness rivals surgery, making it an excellent option for long-term results.
"Definitely consider the FDA-cleared Flyte device as an alternative to surgery." - Dr. Nissrine Nakib, MD (Medical Director of Urology at M Health Fairview & Assistant Professor of Female Urology and Urodynamics at the University of Minnesota)
2. Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy
Working with a pelvic health physical therapist can strengthen the muscles supporting the bladder and urethra, providing natural relief from incontinence symptoms. Tailored exercises such as Kegels and functional movements can improve muscle coordination and control, reducing leaks during physical activities.
Don’t have time for in-person physical therapy? Try the Flyte system where you additionally gain access to Doctors of Physical Therapy specialized in pelvic health to support you while using Flyte.
3. Lifestyle Changes
Small but consistent lifestyle adjustments can significantly improve bladder control. Strategies include:
-
-
- Bladder Training: Gradually increasing the time between bathroom visits can improve bladder capacity and reduce urgency. Check out our blog post THE MENOPAUSE – INCONTINENCE LINK: MYTH OR FACT? for more information.
- Dietary Changes: Avoiding bladder irritants like caffeine, alcohol, soda, and spicy foods can help minimize symptoms. Read Sip smarter by learning to manage these 4 bladder irritants for more details.
- Weight Management: Reducing excess weight decreases pressure on the bladder and pelvic floor.
-
4. Pessaries
These removable devices, inserted into the vagina, provide support to the urethra and can be a viable non-surgical option for some women. Pessaries are particularly effective for mild to moderate cases of stress incontinence while inserted.
If you have any abnormal discharge, consult with your healthcare provider for signs of infection as pessaries remain inserted for prolonged periods of time.
Advocating for Informed Decisions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33c0f/33c0f4f86b8631942b6daa612159ab184fc6a58e" alt="woman talked to woman doctor"
Given the complexities and potential risks of sling surgeries for stress incontinence, it is crucial for patients to be well-informed about their options. Here are some tips for advocating for your health:
- Ask Questions: Don’t hesitate to ask your healthcare provider about the risks, side effects, benefits, and alternatives to surgery. A thorough understanding of your available options can help you make an informed decision.
- Seek Second Opinions: Consulting with another specialist can provide valuable insights and confirm whether surgery is the best option for your unique situation, or if there are new non-invasive treatment options available, like Flyte.
- Consider Non-Surgical Treatments First: Starting with conservative treatments like Flyte allows you to explore effective solutions that deliver results comparable to surgery without committing to invasive procedures.
Conclusion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/073d5/073d5fc5a5d49dd0be573f5c9cc54636e63a38be" alt="woman doctor holding female pelvic model"
While sling surgeries can be effective for treating stress urinary incontinence, they come with a range of potential side effects and long-term risks that should not be overlooked. Women considering this option should have a thorough discussion with their healthcare provider about the benefits, risks, and possible alternatives. Non-invasive treatments like Flyte offer promising outcomes without the complications associated with surgery, making it an excellent first-line treatment for stress incontinence.
References
Mid-urethral Sling image: Reprinted from Mid-urethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence. Figure Retropubic Sling. American Urogynecologic Society. Copyright 2016. Available at: https://www.voicesforpfd.org/assets/2/6/Mid-urethral_Sling.pdf
Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1;(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7:CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4. PMID: 26130017.
Jonsson Funk M, Siddiqui NY, Pate V, Amundsen CL, Wu JM. Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):73.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Oct 5. PMID: 23099189; PMCID: PMC3529743.
Abbott S, Unger CA, Evans JM, Jallad K, Mishra K, Karram MM, Iglesia CB, Rardin CR, Barber MD. Evaluation and management of complications from synthetic mesh after pelvic reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):163.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Oct 11. PMID: 24126300.
Rogo-Gupta L, Baxter ZC, Le NB, Raz S, Rodríguez LV. Long-term durability of the distal urethral polypropylene sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: minimum 11-year followup. J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1822-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.033. Epub 2012 Sep 19. PMID: 22999687.
Muller P, Gurol-Urganci I, van der Meulen J, Thakar R, Jha S. Risk of reoperation 10 years after surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a national population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec;225(6):645.e1-645.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.059. Epub 2021 Sep 9. PMID: 34509439.
Clifton MM, Linder BJ, Lightner DJ, Elliott DS. Risk of Repeat Anti-Incontinence Surgery Following Sling Release: A Review of 93 Cases. Journal of Urology [Internet]. 2014 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Jan 16];191(3):710–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.030
Lundmark Drca A, Alexandridis V, Andrada Hamer M, Teleman P, Söderberg MW, Ek M. Dyspareunia and pelvic pain: comparison of mid-urethral sling methods 10 years after insertion. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Jan;35(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05585-3. Epub 2023 Jul 10. PMID: 37428179; PMCID: PMC10811085.
Lowenstein L, Mustafa S, Gartman I, Gruenwald I. Effect of Midurethral Sling Surgery on Vaginal Sensation. J Sex Med. 2016 Mar;13(3):389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.006. PMID: 26944464.